Should the US Follow the UK By Legalizing Anabolic Steroids » Addiction Unscripted

Should Steroids Be Legalized? Essay

should anabolic steroids be legalized

Not only do they get suspended immediately but if and when they return are often booed by fans, and are basically embarrassed in front of the entire league. Should players that use steroids be banned from the record books Is baseball more exciting with players on steroids? In a poll conducted by the IAAF of sprinters, swimmers, power-lifters and other assorted athletes, most of them U. Conclusion Should marijuana be legalized for recreational and medical purposes? On our top steroids pharmacies on the web you can buy steroids for sale without hassle.

Related Documents

Is marijuana beneficial to patients suffering from serious illness or should it remain illegal to save the lives of many? Only that congress backs birth contol vs steroids. Making steroids legal would allow some who would never use illegal drugs to justify their use. Fifty-nine percent opposed it, and 4 percent remained undecided. Unfortunately, there are some countries which legalized euthanasia. It has no physical performance-enhancing effects. Also, we are one of the few countries in the world that make anabolics illegal, which was done not for anyone's safety but because congress wanted to tell their constituents that they made 'Merica safer.

Steroids, which are also referred to as anabolic — androgenic steroids, are drugs that are derived from the male hormone testosterone. Steroids promote muscle growth and lean body mass.

Steroids have many medical uses. Many athletes abuse steroids to boost their performance. This use and all non-medical use of steroids are illegal in the United States. Though non-medical use of steroids is illegal in the United States, laws regulating steroid use are inadequate. Steroid testing procedures are also inadequate and easily cheated.

True, football players depend on drugs a lot in their everyday life, but the real problem is in the Olympics. It is no secret that almost every Olympic athlete uses steroids in training sometime or another. Dozens of coaches and athletes that were interviewed by Sports Illustrated say that the Atlanta Olympics were a carnival of experiments in the use of Spires 3 performance enhancing drugs. They know how to get under the radar. The original machine done with a gas chromatograph mass spectrometer, was replaced by a much newer and advanced tester, the high-resolution mass spectrometer that would supposedly be able to catch all athletes who had used steroids in the last two or three months.

Unfortunately the two point five million dollar drug testing effort was in fact completely ineffective. The officials are required to watch the athlete urinate. Spires 4 In it was found that two million Americans or 0. Steroid use by adolescent boys has decreased slightly in the past seven years because of the wider availability of over the counter performance enhancing drugs but has doubled over the past seven years for adolescent girls and could be as high as , nationwide.

More girls are competing in sports than ever before, and they have a strong incentive to seek any edge they can. In a poll conducted by the IAAF of sprinters, swimmers, power-lifters and other assorted athletes, most of them U.

One hundred and ninety-five athletes said yes; three-said no. They were also asked if they would take steroids with two guarantees:. More than half of the athletes said yes. Spires 5 Throughout the world athletes depend on steroids more than ever. There are many risks involved with taking steroids. Some of the main side effects are trembling, severe acne, fluid retention, aching joints, high blood pressure, jaundice and liver tumors.

Other side effects include:. Also, steroids can increase hostility and aggression. When prohibition was repealed alcohol consumption leveled off. Congress changed the classification of anabolic steroids to a Schedule III controlled substance. Because Biden and Lungren had a shill in the game named Kenneth Kashin, who was an assistant professor of psychiatry at Yale. He spoke the words the politicians wanted him to say.

Kashin testified that "steroid use can cause an addiction with similarities to alcohol, opiate, and cocaine addiction. He also talked about "dangerous criminal-like behavior while intoxicated on anabolic steroids" and individuals who have "lost control of their behavior," or "became violent.

Based on his bogus testimony, and his alone, Biden and Lungren were able cast aside all the other experts' testimonies, literally hundreds of pages of Congressional transcript, and usurp the law of the land rendering the recommendation of the Secretary of the DHHS null and void.

They broke the law to push forward their political agenda. What was their agenda? It basically had to do with pressure by the sports lobby to stifle the flow of black market steroids to athletes and to preserve the fairytale of the "even playing field" after several years of reports of PED use in college and Olympic sports. The pressure really built in the wake of the summer Olympics, when Canadian Ben Johnson, who streaked down the in an inhuman 9.

Now the politicians' solution had the problem it needed and pushed the Steroid Control Act through Congress. However, after two and a-half decades on the books, the law has proved to be an abysmal failure. What happened was that thousands of otherwise law-abiding Americans — not athletes, but mature adult males — have been arrested, arraigned, prosecuted, convicted, forfeited property, lost their jobs and their licenses, and sentenced to prison for the personal use of anabolic steroids.

Virtually none of them have been Olympic athletes or other pro athletes. They're not cheating in sports; they're not even playing sports. But they're the ones being dragged through the system by a law that was never intended for them. The health risks of steroids have been grossly distorted through the unholy alliance between the vocal alarmists with agendas who incite hysteria based on fiction, the media who reports it, and the vote-hungry lawmakers in Washington who believe they can do something about it.

Take the case of pro wrestler Chris Benoit, who strangled his wife and seven year-old son in and then hung himself from a lat pulldown machine in his home gym. In addition to the empty beer and wine bottles strewn under his body, toxicology tests showed high levels of alcohol, Xanax, and hydrocodone in his system, along with slightly elevated testosterone cypionate due to the replacement dose he was taking that was prescribed by his doctor.

The alcohol, Xanax and hydrocodone were not prescribed. Benoit was also suspected of having a traumatic brain injury resulting from numerous concussions he suffered in the ring. So what was the first thing the media trumpeted as the cause of this tragedy?

Here's a hint, it wasn't the alcohol, the Xanax, the hydrocodone, a combination thereof, or the numerous chair shots to the back of the head.

While a later examination of the case concluded that the repeated brain traumas Benoit had suffered led to a type of dementia that ultimately could have lead to the murder-suicide, the initial accounts of the event caused numerous media reports of steroid use, which led to a federal investigation into steroid abuse in professional wrestling.

Not Xanax, not hydrocodone, not alcohol, not combining them, not the head trauma Statistically, the least probable of all the possible causes. This is how the politicians get their traction for a cause: Here's the most famous and most egregious case. In , Congress was holding hearings on steroids in baseball, a subject to which they devoted more time than the war in Iraq, the economy, healthcare, or why the levees broke in New Orleans during hurricane Katrina, combined.

During these hearings, testimony was heard from Donald Hooton. A month after his 17th birthday, his son, Taylor, hung himself in his bedroom. His parents and a doctor familiar with the case said they believe that Taylor's death was related to depression brought on when Taylor "discontinued the use of anabolic steroids.

His doctors said that the sense of euphoria and aggression that accompany the use of steroids can be replaced by "lethargy, loss of confidence, melancholy and hopelessness when a person stops using performance-enhancing drugs. Gibbons, president and medical director of the Cooper Aerobics Center. He had a bright future. None of it was true. Numerous subsequent scientific evaluations of the facts of the case showed that the Hooton family had a history of depression. The sister had attempted suicide, and the mother was being treated for depression and was on psychotropic drugs.

Taylor himself was being treated with the antidepressant Lexipro, a drug highly noted in the medical literature for causing suicidal ideation in adolescent patients. But there was no mention of any of that. In spite of the fact that there had never been reports of suicide from cessation of steroids, Hooton told congress that he knew steroids killed his son and that the example set by professional athletes, who use steroids, sends a dangerous and deadly message to our youth.

He went on to parlay that appearance before a teary congress into celebrity status, touring the country and speaking out to kids against steroids.

He started the Taylor Hooton Foundation and guilt-tripped the likes of Bud Selig and others to contribute millions of dollars to his anti-steroid crusade, paying himself a handsome salary in the process.

It's been over a decade since Hooton started his foundation. Despite all his speaking engagements, accolades, and fame, steroid use has gone up, suicide among teens prescribed antidepressants remains a threat, and not a single person of any age has committed suicide as a direct result of depression brought on by steroids.

Such bogus anti-steroid sentiment is the backbone of why steroids should be legal. The allegations are nothing but inflated hysterics and simply not true. Science is the bottom line, not the emotional fantasy concocted by the alarmists like Hooton and the media, which is more interested in ratings than facts. A very simple comparison of steroids against all the other legal vices in America, like alcohol and tobacco, as well as numerous over the counter preparations, indicates that steroids, based on a comparative danger to health, should be legal, at least for adult men in good health and under the watchful eye of a doctor.

There is simply no real scientific proof to support anything else. And while it can be said that science does not prove negatives and that any long-term studies using supra-pharmacological doses of gear would be unethical, I'd like to point out a few things science does tell us.

The data consistently points out that steroid users are not the typical "drug addicts" on society's fringe, but rather ordinary, productive people. Rick Collins, the top steroid lawyer in America, and two fellow colleagues — one a doctor, the other a professor of psychology — conducted an anonymous survey of 2, male, adult, non-medical steroid users from 81 countries: The results were published in the peer-reviewed Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition.

In , a new team of researchers from the Mayo Clinic conducted a similar survey using male respondents, focusing on testosterone, with the findings published in the Mayo Clinic Proceedings.

Fifteen years later, the data showed the same people — higher incomes, older, educated, and were more likely to be married — are still using steroids for the same reasons and in the same doses, and exhibited the same responsibility.

Few other categories of illicit drug users would monitor their health markers through regular blood work. As for health consequences among the respondents, "the adverse effects, over a 15 year span, appear to be minor and benign, and are exactly what you would expect for androgenic drugs.

When you add up the truth and subtract the bullshit, the best argument for undoing or revamping the steroid law is that the greatest risk steroids pose the user is to his freedom. Rick Collins sums it up the best:. How'd that work out? About like Titanic's maiden voyage. As in prohibition, legitimacy — doctors and Big Pharma in this case — were driven out, while the black market exploded and doping pervaded sports.

Changing the way steroids are regulated so that legitimate supply and medical monitoring could return to the equation would go a long way toward reducing the harms presented by both underground steroid abuse and the heavy-handed justice system.

Then stop training like someone who is. Here's how to milk your training for all its worth when taking the natural route.

If you can do this, you're officially a bad-ass. If not, well, just trying it will make you a bad-ass. There's more to proper deadlifting than "grip it and rip it. Bodybuilding is full of programs used by "enhanced" lifters, but most people don't take drugs and can't get good results.

This effective program is for them. Here's one of the big "secrets" of success in the gym. Most people won't want to hear it. That's why most people are weak. Don't let the fitness police keep you from doing this safe and proven strength-building lift. Gain an inch on your biceps while building a rock-solid upper body with simple chin-up progressions.

The science of the ripple effect, plus some controversial research on why couples either get fat or stay lean. And it delivers, every time. Most of the reps you do are garbage reps. They add volume but they don't grow anything.

Iamges: should anabolic steroids be legalized

should anabolic steroids be legalized

Bodybuilding is full of programs used by "enhanced" lifters, but most people don't take drugs and can't get good results. Anabolic androgenic steroids are used medically for some forms of anemia, some breast cancers, osteoporosis, endometriosis, and hereditary angiodema, a swelling disorder.

should anabolic steroids be legalized

Add a New Topic.

should anabolic steroids be legalized

But none of that snabolic. Exercise and personal fitness can be extremely psychologically addictive, too. I think goverment should legalize steroids, because it will should anabolic steroids be legalized to buy, we'll know how much to take, and goverment can make money out of it. Should the NFL test for steroids? New to Old Created: